Healthcare News & Insights

5 healthcare technology trends to watch for in 2016

ThinkstockPhotos-491119888Trends about where an industry is headed, especially one as large and complex as healthcare technology, should best be thought of as trajectories rather than binary “did/did not happen” events. But make no mistake, a lot can happen in a year – even in healthcare technology. In this guest post, Mark Ott, director of product at a cloud-based care management system provider, highlights five trends hospital executives can expect to see unfold in 2016. 


1) Value-based train picks up steam, especially for those slow to embrace alternate payment models.

We all know the official timeline the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) laid out in early 2015 – 90% of payments would shift from fee-for-service to value-based payments by 2018. Despite the clear, unambiguous move to value, some in the industry have been slow to transition their organization. However in 2016, expect to see these organizations finally make clear moves to alternative payment models. The significance of this shouldn’t be understated, especially as it pertains to technology adoption.

2) Care Management/Coordination Record rises in importance, as team-based care models expand.

Some call it a Care Management Medical Record and others call it a Care Coordination Record. Regardless of the term, the concept is essentially the same. Electronic medical records (EMRs) excel at capturing in-person encounters, but as care expands beyond those encounters, capturing and tracking what happens between patient visits will be of utmost importance. In addition, enabling care teams to stay on the same page about a patient’s care plan, track action steps and reduce the friction of working together will be crucial to succeeding in a value-based world. Expect to see the Care Management Record concept start catching fire in 2016.

3) Terms ‘care coordination’ and ‘patient engagement’ continue to be abused, misused and watered down.

These terms by themselves have become almost meaningless. There are countless healthcare vendors claiming to deliver on one or both of these capabilities. Seemingly, most companies use these terms “in name only” in an attempt to capture market interest. The onus is on every product company to be very clear just how it enables patient engagement or care coordination. In 2016, the market will start weeding out those products that are patient engagement and care coordination in name only, while rewarding those companies that are actually able to deliver clear value.

4) Integrating devices and device data into care delivery processes will remain a niche activity.

The enthusiasm around wearables, trackers and remote monitoring is exciting, and there’s enormous potential for device data to impact the delivery of care in ways that benefit both patient and provider. But the technology hasn’t caught up with the promise of what it can be, and that won’t change in 2016. Not only is the technology not yet able to deliver, but the incentives and processes to support wide-scale deployment aren’t in place yet. Although all signs point to wearables becoming an integral part of delivery of care, this won’t happen next year.

5) Demand increases for consumer-grade user experiences in healthcare enterprise software.

For so long, clinicians on the frontlines of care delivery have struggled with software that’s hard to use, difficult and downright frustrating. The biggest culprit for poor user experiences in healthcare software has to do with the enterprise purchasing process. Often, vendors build for buyers who aren’t the end users. If the end user and the buyer were the same, you’d see healthcare software vendors value user experience like what we see in other B2B industries, not to mention B2C industries. Regardless, in 2016 we will see more buyer-value products with consumer-grade user experiences. Much of this has to do with end users’ reluctance, and sometimes outright resistance, to adopting technology in their work life. Clinicians often get a bad wrap for being technology averse. But in reality, it’s not that they’re averse to technology; it’s that they’re averse to bad technology.

Mark Ott is director of product at RoundingWell, a cloud-based care management system provider.



Subscribe Today

Get the latest and greatest healthcare news and insights delivered to your inbox.


  1. The potential success of mHealth app is closely connected to the features of data exchange with other apps, both mutual and personal. More than 70% of mHealth apps are able to interact via API or planned to be so. Most of such solutions can be connected to social networks. But only 10-20 of them can connect to other apps via their databases. This feature includes availability for an app to be synchronized with the competitive ones. However, taking into account the trend of mHealth market structure, the successful apps should have these options in order to increase their usability and data scope for patients and physicians collaboration.

    According to the forecast of “Markets and Markets” analytical company the mHealth market will grow in 33,4% till 2020. The reasons are: